Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Turkish Property Segment invest in 2015

Turkish Property is still rising and residences in Turkey are seen as affordable and tempting with sizable investment in 2014 and that growth in sales of Turkish property is likely to keep onin 2015
The Turkish Market seems set to progress in 2015


International real estate market players keep a close eye on a country's wider fiscal position, not just the state of its real estate market, especially in what are still unstable financial times for much of the world. This healthy and ever-increasing level of tourism is sure to bolster property sales in Turkey. This news is especially remarkable given that Spain has only just escaped a bailout, unlike its neighbours Portugal which succumbed, so decisions to invest internationally don't come lightly. As House Sales Turkey previously reported, the Russian overseas property magazine International Residence carried out a investigation at Moscows leading property show in March of this year. Given that The Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism has predicted as many as 1 million more Russian tourists will visit Turkey this year (when over 3 million Russian tourists travelled to Turkey last year), it could be that Russian vendees will bolster real estate in Turkey for some time. While the prices of property in Turkey have slowed in the past few years (just like in the rest of Europe), the market is still jaunty, in part due to variables such as Turkeys strong tourism.
Both districts have healthy sources of demand for rentals, including university campuses. Having a waterfront, means Belikduzu also offers a water taxi service. 115,786 houses changed hands in September. The Turkish property market has cooled down a little from the torrid pace over the last decade. According to the Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat), a total of 1,774 houses were sold to foreigners in August, displaying a significant contrast to the 890 homes sold last year. The canal will connect the Black Sea and the Sea of Marmara, transforming the land along its route and attracting more Gulf investment to the country. They offer a good selection of off plan and newly built quality apartments, within gated complexes and with communal facilities, priced between $100,000 and $200,000, all of which suits the requirements and budget of typical Gulf investors.
Is 2015 the right time to buy real estate in Turkey land and property in Turkey seems to be at the right time of its cycle

Two up and coming districts on Istanbul's European side have become hot spots for Gulf investors purchasing second homes in 2014, it is claimed. Walker also explained that Belikduzu and Bahcesehir both have excellent transport connections, by bus, train and motorway, with the Istanbul's cultural and business districts, as well as the main Istanbul airport (Ataturk International Airport), making transfers from the Middle East easy. However, a slow-down is now evident although growth continues to be recorded.


Residential rental values increased the most in Antalya, the fastest-growing city in Turkey, perennially popular with tourists. Several factors including new value-added tax laws and an anticipated economic cooling in 2014 means reduced domestic sales volume for both new and resale homes through the end of this year. Although the domestic property market still faces challenges and demand remains weak, the climate for foreign investors has improved significantly, with interest focusing mainly on apartments in resort areas. It is widely believed that foreign investors will pick up the slack in the domestic property market as transaction volumes have consistently risen over the last 18 months, showing no loss in investor sentiment for Turkey.

Major infrastructure projects have also underpinned property investment in the country, with more large-scale projects in the pipeline. With fewer restrictions on foreign property purchases, mortgage availability also increased in August after declining for the preceding seven months. Foreign investors in Turkey's property market also received a boost this year, as restrictions on the sale of real estate to foreigners were reduced. Bahcesehir has the Akbati shopping centre, Akkoza mall and Prestige mall. Vatandas said the high cost of land in a dynamic metropolitan areas was responsible for the large price hikes in Istanbul, where more than 14 million people live.




The price index for Istanbul has increased about 8-10 points more within five years compared with the country as a whole. Around 13,611 real estates were sold to foreign buyers in the first nine months of the year, an increase from 12, 181 the year before.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Texas mom breaks world record for donating breast milk - New York Daily News

A northern Texas mom made her way into the Guinness Book of World Records by donating more breast milk than any other woman has — nearly 87 gallons of it.

Alicia Richman, of Granbury, had a son last March and found she was producing more milk than she needed to feed him, according to a press release.

“I was so blessed to have more milk than I needed,” she recalled. “I pumped at work, on vacations, in the car. And I never had to buy formula.”

She saved money on formula, but soon ran out of room in her freezer to store her excess milk. Then she learned about the Mothers’ Milk Bank of North Texas, a nonprofit that provides mother’s milk to babies in intensive care whose own mothers can’t.

Richman started donating to the bank in June 2011, and by March of this year her gifts added up to 11,115 ounces, or 86.8 gallons — shattering the previous “Most Breast Milk Donated” record by more than 23 gallons.

Just three ounces of milk is enough to feed a premature infant nine times, said Amy Vickers, executive director of the Mothers’ Milk Bank. “Alicia’s generous gift of human milk has fed hundreds, and more likely, thousands of premature babies across the United States.”

Richman will be happy to have her record broken — she hoped to be Guinness certified in order to raise awareness of milk banks — though she could be her own toughest competition.

“I’m planning to beat my own record when we have a second baby,” she said.

abartkewicz@nydailynews.com


View the original article here

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Quitting smoking may extend life 10 years - World Science

Quit­ting smok­ing early pro­longs life­span by an aver­age of about 10 years, a big­ger ben­e­fit than was pre­vi­ously un­der­stood, ac­cord­ing to a study of 1.3 mil­lion U.K. wom­en.

The sci­en­tists say that oth­er new re­search sug­gests si­m­i­lar ef­fects in men.

Brit­ish re­search­ers re­cruited 1.3 mil­lion wom­en were to a study be­tween 1996 and 2001, at ages 50 to 65 years. Par­ti­ci­pants filled out a ques­tion­naire about lifestyle, med­i­cal and so­cial fac­tors and were resur­veyed by mail three years lat­er. Wom­en were traced for an av­er­age of 12 years from when they joined. The find­ings were pub­lished in the med­i­cal jour­nal The Lan­cet on Oct. 27.

In­i­tial­ly, 20 per­cent of the study par­ti­ci­pants were smok­ers, 28 per­cent were ex-smok­ers, and 52 per­cent had nev­er smoked. Those who were still smok­ers three years lat­er were found to be nearly three times as likely as non-smok­ers to die over the next nine years, even though some re­duced their risk by stop­ping smok­ing dur­ing this pe­ri­od. 

The three­fold death rate ra­tio means that two-thirds of all deaths of smok­ers in their 50s, 60s, and 70s are caused by smok­ing, as most of the dif­fer­ence be­tween smok­ers and non-smok­ers came from smok­ing-related dis­eases such as lung can­cer, chron­ic lung dis­ease, heart dis­ease, or stroke, the re­search­ers said.

The risks among smok­ers in­creased steeply with amount smoked, al­though even for those who smoked just one cig­a­rette a day at the start of the stu­dy, mor­tal­ity rates were dou­ble those for non-smok­ers.

Both the haz­ards of smok­ing and, ac­cord­ing­ingly, the ben­e­fits of stop­ping are big­ger than pre­vi­ous stud­ies have sug­gested, the in­ves­ti­ga­tors said. Smok­ers who stopped around age 30 were found to avoid 97 per­cent of their ex­cess risk of prem­a­ture death, and al­though se­ri­ous ex­cess haz­ards re­mained for dec­ades among those who smoked un­til age 40 be­fore stop­ping, the ex­cess haz­ards among those who con­tin­ued smok­ing af­ter age 40 were ten times big­ger.

“If wom­en smoke like men, they die like men – but, wheth­er they are men or wom­en, smok­ers who stop be­fore reach­ing mid­dle age will on av­er­age gain about an ex­tra ten years of life,” said study co-author Rich­ard Pe­to, at the Uni­vers­ity of Ox­ford, UK. “Both in the UK and in the USA, wom­en born around 1940 were the first genera­t­ion in which many smoked substanti­al num­bers of cig­a­rettes through­out adult life. Hence, only in the 21st cen­tu­ry could we ob­serve di­rectly the full ef­fects of pro­longed smok­ing, and of pro­longed cessa­t­ion, on prem­a­ture mor­tal­ity among wom­en.”

The au­thors wrote that they found “the pro­por­tion­al ex­cess risk in smok­ers was more marked than in many pre­vi­ous stud­ies, but re­cently up­dat­ed anal­y­ses of 21st cen­tu­ry mor­tal­ity in six smaller co­horts of U.S. smok­ers now sug­gest, in ag­gre­gate, si­m­i­lar haz­ards from smok­ing and ben­e­fits of stop­ping, as does a re­cent study in Jap­a­nese men and wom­en.”

As for their own stu­dy, Pe­to and col­leagues wrote fur­ther that “al­though the rel­a­tive risks for the ef­fects of pro­longed smok­ing on par­tic­u­lar dis­eases can­not be gen­er­al­ised ex­actly to popula­t­ions with very dif­fer­ent back­ground rates of those dis­eases, they should be ap­prox­i­mately gen­er­al­isable to many (though not all) coun­tries where wom­en smoke.”

The re­search was pub­lished to mark the 100th an­ni­ver­sa­ry of the birth of Sir Rich­ard Doll, one of the first peo­ple to iden­ti­fy the link be­tween lung can­cer and smok­ing.


View the original article here

Smokers Who Survive Stroke At Increased Risk Of Another Stroke, Heart Attack, Death

Those who quit smoking before their stroke also had less risk of poorer outcomes than current smokers, researchers found.


Researchers in Melbourne, Australia, tracked 1,589 patients who experienced a first or recurrent stroke in 1996-99. They followed them for 10 years, using medical records and in-person and telephone interviews, and tracked demographics, deaths, recurrent strokes and heart attacks.


Compared to those who never smoked: Those who smoked when they had a stroke were 30 percent more likely to have a poor outcome. Among those who survived the first 28 days after stroke, current smokers had a 42 percent higher risk of poorer outcomes. Ex-smokers had an 18 percent higher risk of poorer outcomes. Compared to past smokers: Among those who survived the first 28 days after stroke, current smokers had a 23 percent higher risk of poorer outcomes during the 10 years. "This research provides fresh incentive to quit smoking now or never start because it shows smokers fare far worse after strokes than non-smokers," said Amanda Thrift, Ph.D., the study's lead researcher and professor of epidemiology for the Department of Medicine in the Southern Clinical School at Monash University in Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

In the study, those living in disadvantaged areas were much more likely to smoke, with 52 percent of current smokers belonging to the most disadvantaged group, compared to 31 percent of those who never smoked.


"We also found smoking had its greatest impact on younger patients," Thrift said. "The people who smoked in our study were younger, more often male, and more often from a disadvantaged background. Although we want everyone to give up smoking, targeting this group could yield greater benefits with fewer dollars spent."


The study focused on patients who survived the most common type of stroke: an ischemic stroke (caused by blood clot). Researchers didn't link smoking to poorer long-term outcomes for patients whose stroke was caused by bleeding within the brain (intracerebral hemorrhage), possibly due to a small sample size.


Previous studies, which have been shorter, had a smaller sample size or were less comprehensive, have provided inconsistent results on smoking's role on long-term outcomes after a stroke.


Stroke is the fourth-leading cause of death and the leading cause of adult disability in the United States.


A stroke occurs about every 40 seconds in America.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our stroke section for the latest news on this subject. Co-authors are Joosup Kim, BBiomedSci; Seana Gall, Ph.D.; Helen Dewey, Ph.D.; Richard Macdonell, M.D.; and Jonathan Sturm, Ph.D. Author disclosures are on the manuscript.
The National Health and Medical Research Council, Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, Foundation for High Blood Pressure Research and the National Stroke Foundation funded the study.
American Heart Association Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

n.p. "Smokers Who Survive Stroke At Increased Risk Of Another Stroke, Heart Attack, Death." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 28 Oct. 2012. Web.
28 Oct. 2012. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


'Smokers Who Survive Stroke At Increased Risk Of Another Stroke, Heart Attack, Death'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.


If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.


Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Best Place To Help You Stop Smoking

Friday, October 26, 2012

Panel: Pregnant women, get whooping cough shot - Boston.com

AP Medical Writer /  October 24, 2012

ATLANTA (AP) — An expert panel is urging every expecting mother to get a shot preventing whooping cough, preferably in the last three months of her pregnancy to help protect her baby.

The advice follows a frightening resurgence of the dreaded childhood disease. More than 32,000 cases, including 16 deaths, have been reported so far this year, and 2012 is on track to be the nation’s worst year for whooping cough since 1959.

It’s only the second time a vaccine has been advised for all women during pregnancy. Flu shots were first recommended for them in the 1990s.

The new advice was approved in a vote Wednesday by the government’s vaccine advisory panel. Federal health officials usually adopt the group’s guidance and promote it to doctors and the public.

Whooping cough, or pertussis, is a highly contagious disease. Its name comes from the sound children make as they gasp for breath.

Despite long-standing childhood immunizations, cases have been climbing in the past decade. Most are infants two months and younger — too young to be vaccinated because their immune systems are too immature.

Health officials increasingly have pushed to get older children and adults vaccinated, to reduce the number of carriers who might infect vulnerable infants. An estimated 30 to 40 percent of infected newborns got the disease from their mothers.

In recent years, a combination vaccine — that included protection against pertussis— was offered to women immediately after they gave birth. Then after a whooping cough epidemic in California, the panel last year recommended a one-time dose of a combination vaccine for expectant mothers, either before or during pregnancy.

But fewer than 3 percent of pregnant women have gotten the vaccination, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Worse, recent research has shown the whooping cough vaccine’s protection doesn’t last as long as previously thought. A recent study found women vaccinated within two years of their pregnancy had relatively few antibodies to pass on to their newborns. That included women vaccinated early in their pregnancy, said Dr. Mary Healy, the Baylor College of Medicine researcher who led the study. That suggests women need to be vaccinated during the third trimester for it to really have an effect, she said.

Despite the overwhelming vote tally, several members of the panel voiced uneasiness with a lack of data on how effective and safe such a recommendation will be for mothers and newborns.

CDC officials acknowledge they have data on only hundreds of women who got the shots during pregnancy. What’s more, the vaccine is only licensed to be given to adults once. Under the new recommendation, women who raise large families may be getting the vaccine three or four or more times.

But CDC experts repeated there’s no evidence of serious risk to either mothers or newborns. And they estimated that enacting the recommendation could reduce whooping cough cases by 33 percent, hospitalizations by 38 percent and deaths by 49 percent.

‘‘The benefits of vaccination outweigh the theoretical risks,’’ said Jennifer Liang, a CDC epidemiologist who presented the benefit estimates to the panel.end of story marker

© Copyright 2012 Globe Newspaper Company.

View the original article here

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Spending on Medicaid Has Slowed, Survey Finds - New York Times

Medicaid provides health and long-term care coverage to more than 60 million poor people, at a combined cost to the states and federal government of more than $400 billion a year. During the recession, as Americans lost jobs and health insurance, enrollment in the program rose sharply, and states struggled under the weight of its costs. But in the fiscal year that ended for most states in June, total spending on Medicaid grew by only 2 percent — much less than the nearly 10 percent increase in 2011 and one of the lowest rates on record. The slowdown is due not only to more measured enrollment growth — 3.2 percent, compared with 4.4 percent in 2011 and 7.2 percent in 2010 — but also to continued cost-cutting by states. “Reining in costs remains the dominant theme,” said Diane Rowland, executive vice president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan group that conducts the survey annually with Health Management Associates, a research and consulting firm. The most typical Medicaid spending cuts were to reimbursement rates for hospitals and doctors and to optional benefits, like dental, vision and drug coverage. Forty-five states cut or froze reimbursement rates last year, according to the report, while 18 scaled back benefits. Many also expanded the use of managed care for their Medicaid populations. The national health care law has generally prohibited states from tightening eligibility for Medicaid before 2014, when the law envisions expanding the program to cover more low-income people. So the slowing of enrollment is not because fewer people are qualifying, Ms. Rowland said, but because fewer “are coming through the door.” Last year was something of an aberration, because states stopped receiving extra federal Medicaid funds that had flowed for nearly three years as part of the federal stimulus act. Without the additional help, the state share of Medicaid spending rose by 27.5 percent last year, according to the survey. That put additional pressure on states to limit costs and helps explain the modest increase in spending. Medicaid has been the subject of heated national debate in recent months, both because the Supreme Court ruled in June that states could opt out of the expansion that is a cornerstone of the health care law and because President Obama and Mitt Romney, his Republican challenger, have sharply different visions for the program’s future. Mr. Romney and Republicans in Congress want to repeal the health care law and replace the current Medicaid program with block grants, giving each state a fixed amount of federal money each year and more control over eligibility and benefits. (The federal government currently sets minimum requirements, like covering all children under the poverty level, and provides unlimited matching funds.) Medicaid spending will grow modestly again this fiscal year, the survey found, with an average increase of 3.8 percent. Enrollment will continue to increase, but by only 2.7 percent, an even slower rate than last year. More than one-third of states say they could see a Medicaid budget shortfall, but that is an improvement over last year, when more than half of states predicted a shortfall. States will also step up attempts to better coordinate care for Medicaid enrollees, especially those with expensive chronic conditions. Thirty states started or expanded such programs last year, the survey found, and 45 are doing so this fiscal year. Many such programs focus on “dual eligibles” — nine million people who qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid, are especially complicated to treat and account for a disproportionate share of spending. “Those changes are an investment up front and require a longer lead time in terms of seeing savings down the road,” Ms. Rowland said.
View the original article here